jpskewedthrone: (Default)
[personal profile] jpskewedthrone
Why was Data not wirelessly connected to the Enterprise?

Date: 2010-10-02 12:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] selfavowedgeek.livejournal.com
Okay, that's IT! The series is officially ruined for any repeat viewings.

I will never see it without thinking of your post.

;)

Date: 2010-10-02 12:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jennifer-dunne.livejournal.com
Because they were concerned about leaving a "back door" that would allow the villianous species of choice to hack into the system ... the way James T. Kirk hacked into the Klingon ship in one of the movies. ;-)

ETA: replaced "Klingons" with "villianous species of choice"
Edited Date: 2010-10-02 12:27 am (UTC)

Date: 2010-10-02 12:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tinhuviel.livejournal.com
Data was Apple and the Enterprise was PC.

Date: 2010-10-02 12:44 am (UTC)
naomikritzer: (Default)
From: [personal profile] naomikritzer
Data is a sentient and autonomous android. And he's NOT THE CAPTAIN.

Now, if they gave him his own ship, THAT should totally have wireless access.

Date: 2010-10-02 03:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sodyera.livejournal.com
I agree. Besides, remember Capt. Adama's refusal to integrate systems on Galactica. The man knew his stuff! GIve him credit, already.

Date: 2010-10-02 12:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mtlawson.livejournal.com
Data would have been considered a security risk if he were directly connected in some form to the Enterprise's systems. He was a foreign body, not built or specced by Starfleet, and therefore a source of potential harm to the systems.

Date: 2010-10-02 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mtlawson.livejournal.com
Egad, I've worked in IT Security for too long.

Date: 2010-10-02 12:47 am (UTC)
naomikritzer: (Default)
From: [personal profile] naomikritzer
I had that thought, too.

My other theory: in the Star Trek universe, wireless connectivity was never invented.

Date: 2010-10-10 12:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jpsorrow.livejournal.com
See, I think they did have wireless connectivity though. Look at the medical tricorders. They hold up a small object in one hand and run it over the body, but they look at their medical tricorder, which is in the other hand. They've got to be wirelessly connected.

Date: 2010-10-02 01:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mardott.livejournal.com
It would have been a waste of his abilities. As a sentient, autonomous android, he could function in any capacity they needed him. Why tie him down to just one ship?

Date: 2010-10-02 01:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thesaucernews.livejournal.com
The real reason is because Brent Spiner not interacting with the scenery doesn't make for interesting television.

In-universe, it's entirely possible his positronic brain wasn't built to allow for that sort of thing... either because he was a prototype without that capability or because it would run counter to his purpose of emulating human experience. Being a unique individual, they may not have even tried upgrading him in case doing so would damage an architecture they barely understood to begin with... this all assuming Data would have wanted such an upgrade in the first place. He did seem to prefer tactile experiences like painting with actual paint and owning a cat as opposed to digital art and owning a holographic representation of a cat.

The real question is why didn't anyone save Barclay's plans for the telepathic machine interface that he built in the holodeck?

Date: 2010-10-02 02:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tygerversionx.livejournal.com
Because Data knew that the Enterprise was a loose gal, and didn't want to catch anything from her. :D

Date: 2010-10-02 02:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gategrrl.livejournal.com
This has to be the BEST DAMNED question related to TNG that I've seen EVER!!!!!!
(deleted comment)

Date: 2010-10-10 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jpsorrow.livejournal.com
Yeah, this is what I think the real explanation is.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2010-10-10 12:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jpsorrow.livejournal.com
Yeah, I think the "want to be human" thing is the main reason as well.

You Did Ask

Date: 2010-10-02 03:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sodyera.livejournal.com
Actually, the closes they got to integrating an Artificial Crewman with the ship's systems were:
a: The Interface device that Dwight Schultz's character Barkley developed after being exposed to a higher order technology, and
b: the Emergency Command Officer Hologram feature Doctor Joe devised on Voyager (Joe being the name the EMH finally chose in the last episode's future.

Date: 2010-10-02 01:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jjschwabach.livejournal.com
Because he is Retro-Tech!

Date: 2010-10-02 01:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jjschwabach.livejournal.com
Oh, plus, you have to remember that this is a culture whose cell-phones (at least in TOS) were six times the size of what's available to us now.

Date: 2010-10-02 04:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kmarkhoover.livejournal.com
Because more often than not the people who wrote for this show knew jack all about science fiction.

Date: 2010-10-02 10:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] serge-lj.livejournal.com
NCC-1701-D remembers what happened to NCC-1701 when they gave Doctor Daystrom's M5 control?

Date: 2010-10-04 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] delkytlar.livejournal.com
Data is strictly Bluetooth. No long-range connectivity.

Date: 2010-10-05 08:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steve-buchheit.livejournal.com
Hell, Data took over the Enterprise, what, 3 times. Imagine if he could just directly drive the thing with his positronic mind? Data yawns while imitating humans and the damn saucer section decouples at warp speed.

Profile

jpskewedthrone: (Default)
Joshua Palmatier

April 2020

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 26th, 2025 05:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios