Writing Update
Feb. 25th, 2009 09:29 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
For those keeping track of whether I'm still writing or not . . . I am. I'm working on the new project while I wait to hear from my editor about Well of Sorrows. The new project is the first book in a new series. I wrote the first four chapters in January, got critiques of those, revised the first 3 chapters and wrote the plot synopsis . . . and then I set it aside for a few weeks.
Now I'm on break from school, so I've been writing the last few days and chapter 4 has now been revised to fit the changes to chatpers 1-3 and the plot synopsis. Much stronger chapter now. I'm hoping to start work on chapter 5 today and finish that before school resumes on Monday. We'll see. It's all from scratch now, and that usually goes slower.
But during all of this, Geogre R.R. Martin did a post about receiving "fan" mail wondering where the next book in the Song of Ice and Fire series was and why it wasn't on the shelf yet. I thought I'd comment on that as a writer.
I have, so far, managed to get all of my novels written and turned in by deadline. And I think they've been good books. Maybe not great, but that's what editors are for: helping turn good books into great books. However, I totally expect that at some point in the future (assuming I continue to get published of course), there will be a time when I won't make deadline. I'm hoping there will be perfectly good reasons, such as:
1. Life. I mean, seriously, who hasn't had something unexpected happen that derails everything and puts you behind schedule?
2. Respect. By this I mean that I'd hope I'd force myself to write something late but good, rather than something on-time that sucks, out of pure respect for the reader. I personally hate reading a book by an author I love that sucks or that sounds like it was just dashed off. I never want to hand in a "dashed-off" book.
3. Struggle. I experienced this with The Vacant Throne. Sometimes, you have a nice idea of what the book will be about, the plot, the character arc, etc, and then when you sit down and start writing the book wants to do something else. At first you struggle with the book, because you DO have a deadline and going off in a completely unknown direction takes time. But eventually you cave and do what the book wants (I hope) and it turns out to be a better version than you'd originally imagined. Unfortunately, this takes time in two ways: you waste time while struggling with the book in the first place, and then once you cave, it takes time to recover and find out what the book is really about.
I had a few other reasons, but now that I look at them, I think they (and the point of this entire post) all boils down to Number 2: respect. I know I constantly worry while writing about whether what I'm producing is good enough, and all of this stems from the fact that I don't want to disappoint the readers, because I respect them. (They do, after all, completely control whether or not I sell another book by whether they buy my books.)
I don't know George R.R. Martin personally, and I have no insight into why it might be taking him longer to finish the new novel than expected . . . but I have a strong suspicion that it has to do with the "respect" option. He must be thinking he has to please his fans (and he's got A LOT more fans that I do), that he has to write the best book possible so as not to disappoint them. And unlike me he has created a much wider story and world, so I can only imagine the horrors of trying to keep all of those plot threads straight and pull off the best story possible at the same time.
I've read elsewhere that it's not really the fact that the book hasn't materialized yet that is upsetting the fans (although they would like to see it sometime soon), but that there was a misinterpretation of what happened with Feast of Crows. Supposedly, he had a much larger book that was too large to print, so they split the book in two, with Feast of Crows as book 1 and with some tweaking Dance of Dragons would be released shortly afterwards as book 2. I don't know if this is true, but as a writer I know that "tweaking" sometimes means ripping the entire book apart and rewriting it from the ground up. If this did happen, I still think it comes back to the respect thing. You only do something that drastic as a "tweak" if you think the end result is going to be much better than the original.
I also haven't read the series so don't know if he ended on a cliffhanger or what. (I read book 1, realized it was a series, and have bought all of the books in the series since then since book 1 was good, and intend to read them all once the last book is out.) But again, if the new book hasn't materialized, I would think it comes back to the respect thing again.
In the end, I'd hope that my fans would be understanding in the future if I missed a deadline in order to produce a better book, for whatever reason.
Now I'm on break from school, so I've been writing the last few days and chapter 4 has now been revised to fit the changes to chatpers 1-3 and the plot synopsis. Much stronger chapter now. I'm hoping to start work on chapter 5 today and finish that before school resumes on Monday. We'll see. It's all from scratch now, and that usually goes slower.
But during all of this, Geogre R.R. Martin did a post about receiving "fan" mail wondering where the next book in the Song of Ice and Fire series was and why it wasn't on the shelf yet. I thought I'd comment on that as a writer.
I have, so far, managed to get all of my novels written and turned in by deadline. And I think they've been good books. Maybe not great, but that's what editors are for: helping turn good books into great books. However, I totally expect that at some point in the future (assuming I continue to get published of course), there will be a time when I won't make deadline. I'm hoping there will be perfectly good reasons, such as:
1. Life. I mean, seriously, who hasn't had something unexpected happen that derails everything and puts you behind schedule?
2. Respect. By this I mean that I'd hope I'd force myself to write something late but good, rather than something on-time that sucks, out of pure respect for the reader. I personally hate reading a book by an author I love that sucks or that sounds like it was just dashed off. I never want to hand in a "dashed-off" book.
3. Struggle. I experienced this with The Vacant Throne. Sometimes, you have a nice idea of what the book will be about, the plot, the character arc, etc, and then when you sit down and start writing the book wants to do something else. At first you struggle with the book, because you DO have a deadline and going off in a completely unknown direction takes time. But eventually you cave and do what the book wants (I hope) and it turns out to be a better version than you'd originally imagined. Unfortunately, this takes time in two ways: you waste time while struggling with the book in the first place, and then once you cave, it takes time to recover and find out what the book is really about.
I had a few other reasons, but now that I look at them, I think they (and the point of this entire post) all boils down to Number 2: respect. I know I constantly worry while writing about whether what I'm producing is good enough, and all of this stems from the fact that I don't want to disappoint the readers, because I respect them. (They do, after all, completely control whether or not I sell another book by whether they buy my books.)
I don't know George R.R. Martin personally, and I have no insight into why it might be taking him longer to finish the new novel than expected . . . but I have a strong suspicion that it has to do with the "respect" option. He must be thinking he has to please his fans (and he's got A LOT more fans that I do), that he has to write the best book possible so as not to disappoint them. And unlike me he has created a much wider story and world, so I can only imagine the horrors of trying to keep all of those plot threads straight and pull off the best story possible at the same time.
I've read elsewhere that it's not really the fact that the book hasn't materialized yet that is upsetting the fans (although they would like to see it sometime soon), but that there was a misinterpretation of what happened with Feast of Crows. Supposedly, he had a much larger book that was too large to print, so they split the book in two, with Feast of Crows as book 1 and with some tweaking Dance of Dragons would be released shortly afterwards as book 2. I don't know if this is true, but as a writer I know that "tweaking" sometimes means ripping the entire book apart and rewriting it from the ground up. If this did happen, I still think it comes back to the respect thing. You only do something that drastic as a "tweak" if you think the end result is going to be much better than the original.
I also haven't read the series so don't know if he ended on a cliffhanger or what. (I read book 1, realized it was a series, and have bought all of the books in the series since then since book 1 was good, and intend to read them all once the last book is out.) But again, if the new book hasn't materialized, I would think it comes back to the respect thing again.
In the end, I'd hope that my fans would be understanding in the future if I missed a deadline in order to produce a better book, for whatever reason.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 03:35 pm (UTC)Focus
Date: 2009-02-25 03:14 pm (UTC)Have you ever experienced this and how have you gotten over it?
Re: Focus
Date: 2009-02-25 03:17 pm (UTC)So I wouldn't worry about your grand ideas not appearing in each page you write or while you're writing those pages. Just make the scene as powerful as possible with an idea that you're HEADING toward the grand idea . . . and I think things will work out.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 03:21 pm (UTC)Its not that I disagree with your post, but I think that there is another angle to the respect - you don't set deadlines (or at least announce them) and break them without a word, especially when you have other new works being written and published in the meantime.
It doesn't matter if that you, as a writer, doesn't know your fans personally. But the fans feel like they know you. And a promise is a promise, a deadline is a deadline. Things happen, they get missed. But if you felt you owed your fans one to begin with (or were cocky enough to put one up); then you should at least be honest when you miss them.....
And yes, I am a fan of Soif, so this does irk me personally; but I have seen this happen again and again and again...I mean, my god, don't even mention the supposed third book in the Koontz Frankenstein series to any bookstore employee! *twitch*
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 06:33 pm (UTC)But I can totally see why fans might be upset if he said he'd have it finished by June, then December, then June of the next year, etc. He probably shouldn't be announcing those deadlines unless he knows he can keep them in good faith at the time.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 04:02 pm (UTC)GRRM is the absolute best in his field, so who cares if he takes another year or two to finish the book, it'll pay off in the end and we'll all be the richer for it.
My problem is, however, that I can't really get myself to read A Feast for Crows. I tried, but it really does feel like half a book. My plan is to read AFFC alongside Dance of Dragons, so as to get the true feel of the story.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 05:34 pm (UTC)Frankly, I think what is going on is that a huge book like that, with so many storylines just takes time to write. It can't be done on the one-a-year plan.
As impatient as I am, I'd rather he do a good job than rush.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 05:36 pm (UTC)I also have a question for you:
What have you done when you've hit writer's block? You have a vague idea of what you're writing, but nothing specific is coming forward. You're trying to force it or generate it, and you sit at the blank paper and nothing works (I find I have an easier time writing on paper first). EVen if you just start writing what's on your mind (i.e., your inability to write), you just end up writing your thoughts, and nothing helpful. Is there anything you do to break that? The other related problem is having various scenes from the book, but nothing linking them together. Almost as though it would work better as a series of shorter stories instead of as a novel. ARGH (Though that could be an idea of how to write it for now)
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 06:51 pm (UTC)I can't say anything about the unconnected scene issue though. I always write the story from beginning to end. That's just my process. So I don't end up with disconnected scenes. In fact, my scenes end up so connected that it can become a problem during revision stage, when I need to add in a whole new scene or something like that. All of the connections with the current scenes have to be severed and reestablished with the new scene, which can be a pain in the ass.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 07:04 pm (UTC)I might have a bit too much perfectionism, so I will try out the notion of writing crap. It will get itself sorted out eventually, I'm sure.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 02:56 pm (UTC)And I certainly hope a novel never presents itself to me in disjointed pieces. I think my mathematical brain might go apoplectic if it does.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 07:55 pm (UTC)LOL Let's hope in your case that all plots remain linear, then. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 06:28 pm (UTC)Couldn't even find them in my favorite used/rare book store.}:(
I guess I'll just have to order them online. Horrors.}:P
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 06:53 pm (UTC)The B&N should be able to order the books in as well. I'm surprised they don't have Vacant Throne on the shelf though, since the paperback came out within the last 2 months.
If you do order them through Amazon.com online, click through one of my Amazon links on my user page. Anything you order from Amazon after clicking through the link gives me a few cents in "kickback", which is what I use to help fund the free books I give away here and at
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 07:18 pm (UTC)I never order enough from anywhere to get free shipping, so no worries there.}:P
no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 02:42 am (UTC)I'm working on what's technically my second novel writing project. (I worked on the first one for about ten years before deciding to put it away for a bit because it got stale in my head.) But much like the first project, this wants to be a trilogy. Which is fine, but I've set out on this course and I'm left to wonder how to handle one thing.
When you finished The Skewed Throne, did you dive into writing The Cracked Throne right away or did you wait and see if the first one would sell? Did you sell the first one as part one of three? How did all that work for you? I hope you don't mind me being nosey.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 02:53 pm (UTC)So I learned then that working on the sequel wasn't all that wise, that I'd wasted a bunch of time working on a book that couldn't sell when I could have been at work on something new that might even if that first book didn't.
When that revelation hit, I stopped working on the sequel and began a new book. And while I was sending that book out to agents and editors (with the same kinds of rejections) I began working on The Skewed Throne. Needless to say, I didn't work on The Cracked Throne right away while sending that one out. I began something new. In fact, I didn't start working on the sequel to Skewed until I had an actual contract for it.
And I initially presented Skewed as a standalone novel. However DAW was interested and asked if there were more books after that and I said yes and sent them very rough plot synopses of Cracked and Vacant. They bought all three at that point, which is when I began work on Cracked.
I'd suggest you try to write the first book (even if you know it's a series) in such a way that it has a nice, solid, coherent ending with the possibility of more to come . . . but not the necessity of more to come. This is likely to be the most appealing to an editor looking at the manuscript.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 03:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 02:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 04:46 am (UTC)Do you have a link to the post? I have more things to say on this topic, I think, but I don't think I want to say them until I've read the post and I know a little more, since I'm not familiar with GRRM.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 02:45 pm (UTC)